Due Diligence & Screening · EntityLink Mapper
Map relationships between organizations, people, and events
Build a relationship map between organizations, people, and events — grounded strictly in the data you provide, with every link tied to the evidence that supports it.
Illustrative content · Public sources only
| Relationship | Evidence basis | Confidence |
|---|---|---|
| Person A — director of Org B | Provided registry extract | High |
| Org B — supplier to Org C | Contract reference in notes | Medium |
| Person A — attended Event X | Provided article | Medium |
| Org C — possible shared address | Single mention, unconfirmed | Low |
A decision-ready artifact
What you get
A focused brief that keeps the evidence, uncertainty, and next actions visible.
- An indexed list of entities found in your material
- A relationship table where every link cites its evidence
- Confidence notes per relationship
- Cluster and pattern observations for reviewer attention
- Ambiguous or single-source links flagged separately
- Suggested next checks to confirm or close gaps
Start with what you know
What you can enter
From input to source-linked brief
- 01Data intake
Provide the documents, notes, and links — the map is built only from this material.
- 02Entity extraction
Identify organizations, people, and events and resolve obvious duplicates.
- 03Link grounding
Connect entities only where the provided data supports it, with confidence per link.
- 04Relationship map
Review the map, flagged ambiguities, and suggested checks.
Use cases
See how organizations, officers, and events in a case file actually connect.
Understand clusters and shared touchpoints across a set of related entities.
Add a relationship view to a counterparty review — ownership, roles, and shared history.
Give an investigator a traceable map of who and what appears in the evidence.
What this is not
4S8 works with public sources, your case material, and source-linked analysis to support human review — not to replace legal, compliance, or investigative judgment.
- Strictly grounded in provided data — no links are inferred without evidence
- A map of documented relationships, not a conclusion about their meaning
- Not a beneficial-ownership determination or legal finding
- No access to your systems; works on the material you supply
- Single-source and ambiguous links are marked, not promoted
- Human review required before acting on any connection
Frequently asked questions
Where do the relationships come from?
Only from the material you provide. Every link in the map cites the document, note, or source that supports it — if there is no evidence, there is no link.
Is this a legal or ownership determination?
No. It maps documented connections to support analysis. Ownership, control, or liability conclusions require human judgment and appropriate verification.
What happens with weak or conflicting evidence?
Weak links are marked low-confidence and listed separately; conflicts are flagged rather than resolved silently.
Can I extend the map later?
Yes. You can add new material in later runs and rebuild the map, keeping evidence references intact.
Start with a source-linked brief
Start free — begin now and get a structured, reviewable artifact back.
Map Relationships